[l2h] Fails to number figures: bogus "arguments too complex" erro r.
John Blackburn
John.Blackburn at npl.co.uk
Tue Oct 18 16:15:23 CEST 2005
I am having problems compiling a LaTeX document to HTML. It works fine except that some of the figures are not numbered (they are referenced by number in the text but figure caption just says Figure: blah..). The output contains many errors like:
===============================================
,Arguments to leftmargin are too complex ...
It will not be processed unless used in another environment
===============================================
and then many instances of
===============================================
No number for "Thefourpossibleconstitutiveequationforms.Innon-linearsystems,them
aterialparameters,$s,c,hatepsilon,beta,d,e,g,h$(compliance,stiffness,permittivit
y,inversepermittivity,and4piezoelectriccouplingfactors)arefunctionsofthespecifie
dindependentvariables.Inlinearsystemsonly,etc."
===============================================
I don't understand the problem as I am not using the \leftmargin command. I don't even know what it does!
Also, it says
===============================================
Unknown commands: z_at_ p_at_
===============================================
I am not using these commands, I don't know what they are!
My .tex file is vanilla LaTeX, the preamble is
===============================================
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphics}
\setlength{\topmargin}{0cm}
\setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}
\setlength{\textheight}{22cm}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm}
\setlength{\marginparwidth}{2cm}
\begin{document}
\renewcommand{\vec}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
\renewcommand{\d}{\partial}
\renewcommand{\t}[1]{\mathrm{#1}}
\newcommand{\eq}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\f}[1]{Figure \ref{#1}}
\newcommand{\dee}{\mathrm{d}}
\newcommand{\dd}[2]{\left(\frac{\d #1}{\d #2}\right)}
\newcommand{\ddd}[3]{\left(\frac{\d #1}{\d #2}\right)_{#3}}
\newcommand{\rms}{{\footnotesize rms}~}
\newcommand{\peak}{{\footnotesize peak}~}
\title{Non linear piezoelectric resonance}
\author{John Blackburn}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
This aim of this document is to compare three non-linear piezoelectric
test methods: constant voltage, constant current and burst mode ...
===============================================
Typical figure
===============================================
\begin{figure}
\scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{contv}}
\caption{Experimental setup for constant voltage. OSC output is in
range 5mV\rms-1.1V\rms. The amplifier magnifies voltage up to
$100\times$. The input to port A is voltage over piezoelectric
divided by 10,000 to keep it low enough. The current detectors
create 1V per 1A.}
\label{contv}
\end{figure}
===============================================
and it is referenced by
===============================================
... as shown in \f{contv}.
===============================================
I would appreciate any help!!
John Blackburn
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
privileged material; it is for the intended addressee(s) only.
If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or
disclose such information.
NPL Management Ltd cannot guarantee that the e-mail or any
attachments are free from viruses.
NPL Management Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. No: 2937881
Registered Office: Serco House, 16 Bartley Wood Business Park,
Hook, Hampshire, United Kingdom RG27 9UY
-------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the latex2html
mailing list