[l2h] image generation problem

[jos]

I think Ross mentioned earlier that overly large figures can cause extra 
blank images.  You might search for "Overfull \vbox" in images.log.

Since this is such a disaster when it happens, I have the following in all 
my Makefiles that run LaTeX2HTML:

$(HTMLDIR): ...
         ...
         if (grep 'Overfull \\vbox' $(HTMLDIR)/images.log) \
            then echo "*** FATAL OVERFULL VBOX IN L2H $(HTMLDIR)/images.log 
***"; exit 1; fi

Julius

At 08:51 PM 4/23/2005, Bob van der Poel wrote:


>Progress!!
>
>I have taken out the -ldump option from the command line in my makefile.
>Images are now produced.
>
>I'm not sure why this worked just fine with previous versions of latex.
>But, I'll live with image regeneration for now :) I really just want to
>to start to work...
>
>I am still having an output problem, seems that I'm getting extra, blank, 
>images in the file. I think this might just be a macro problem in my 
>source. I'll have a look ... but, tomorrow :) Getting too late here. 
>Funny(?) that this all worked so well until I upgraded :)
>
>Thanks!
>
>Ross Moore wrote:
>>On 24/04/2005, at 12:47 PM, Bob van der Poel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ross Moore wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello Bob,
>>>>On 24/04/2005, at 8:53 AM, Bob van der Poel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Ross, before we get to far into all this with me sending log files back
>>>and forth  :)  I am using tetex 3.0. This is the nasty new version which
>>>sets latex to pdflatex.
>>
>>Yes; I guessed that, which is why I suggested that maybe you are
>>getting .pdf files from images.tex  rather than .dvi --> .ps files.
>>I've not installed teTeX 3.0 anywhere yet, and do not run Mandrake
>>on any of my machines, so am really not sure just what is happening
>>to you. So I really do need answers to the questions that I asked
>>in the previous email, if I'm to be able to help diagnose the cause
>>of the problem.
>>
>>>I did some searching earlier and saw some
>>>comments/fixes to html.sty (?). Whatever they were, I checked my install
>>>and it appears that the fixes were done. Am I missing something else
>>>quite obvious?
>>
>>Yes, but those only affect running LaTeX on the source document;
>>e.g. to produce a .aux file, or to have the same document able
>>to produce print-quality output (PDF or .dvi) as well as HTML pages.
>>It should have no significant effect on the LaTeX2HTML run.
>>
>>>
>>>The actual tetex is tetex-3.0-8mdk from rpm.
>>
>>Fine; but I'm not in a position to test using this for myself.
>>
>>Hope this helps,
>>     Ross
>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA **
>>>EMAIL: bvdp at uniserve.com
>>>WWW:   http://mypage.uniserve.com/~bvdp
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>latex2html mailing list
>>>latex2html at tug.org
>>>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Ross Moore                                         ross at maths.mq.edu.au
>>Mathematics Department                             office: E7A-419
>>Macquarie University                               tel: +61 +2 9850 8955
>>Sydney, Australia                                  fax: +61 +2 9850 8114
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA **
>EMAIL: bvdp at uniserve.com
>WWW:   http://mypage.uniserve.com/~bvdp
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>latex2html mailing list
>latex2html at tug.org
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
>