[l2h] Maintenance of latex2html
Roland Stigge
stigge at antcom.de
Wed Oct 15 12:16:41 CEST 2003
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 10:57, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> > It being at least _possible_ to charge $200 is exactly what Debian
> > requires from Free Software. Besides the GPL, please consider the
> > LPPL or any other free license approved at
> > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/.
>
> The LPPL isn't OSI approved, and the LPPL in its current form was
> rejected by Debian. The is a new version on its way though.
Right. That's why I listed the LPPL separately and it's not my favourite
license. But latex2html having the same license as latex would be OK,
IMHO.
Feel free to remove LPPL from the above list. ;)
bye,
Roland
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/latex2html/attachments/20031015/bca139dd/attachment.bin
More information about the latex2html
mailing list