[l2h] Re: includegraphics broken in latex2html-2002-2-1 ?
bruce.miller at nist.gov
Wed Jun 11 01:06:47 CEST 2003
Herb W. Swan wrote:
> OK, the [angle=-90] optional argument to \includegraphics is an unnecessary
> distraction. Let's say we take it out. My test document (test19.tex) then
OK, but w/o the rotation, my system using v 2002-2-1 produces the image just fine.
> Please note that:
> 1) Neither dvips nor pstoimg is called.
Indeed. That's strange.
> 2) There is no l2h* directory left behind in /tmp.
as if it thought it had succeeded?
Inspecting the code between "*** processing # images ***"
and "Generating postscript images using dvips",
there's a $NO_IMAGES flag. Setting that to 1 produces exactly
the symptoms you're seeing. So, as the Country Doctor says: "Don't do that!".
Apparently if you use $NO_IMAGES, you're then supposed to generate
the images off-line by re-running l2h using the images_only option
(I've never used it this way)
I suppose it would be helpfull if it printed a reminder instead of silently
skipping; especially to provide a clue if it wasn't done intentionally!
> So it still appears that although latex2html-2002-2-1 does indeed fix the
> absolute path problem, it introduces another more serious bug, which prevents
> it from processing "normal" .ps files.
or it simply got configured oddly, for some reason.
More information about the latex2html