[gentium] gentium -> victor?
pavel.farar at centrum.cz
pavel.farar at centrum.cz
Mon Apr 13 20:07:36 CEST 2015
Hi Karl,
here are the updated fonts. I still used the old FontForge.
The developer version of GentiumPlus fonts contains PostScript
flavoured otf fonts. They have no kerning, but they have
PostScript curves and hinting. I would definitely use them as
a base for the Type 1 fonts (and take the kerning from ttf).
However,I think that it would complicate the conversion now if
I would convert the two styles of GentiumPlus and the two
styles of Gentium diferently.
There is an anouncement that the two remaining standard styles
of GentiumPlus should appear soon (however I read it already
before the version 5 appeared). It also looks like the kerning
should be improved.
I seems to me that it will be even more _major_ update of the
fonts than the current one and I would rewrite the conversion
scripts appropriately.
I think that it is less important to use newer version of
FontForge than to use the original PostScript curves
and hints provided by Victor. I really appreciate that
he provided the otf fonts.
All best,
Pavel
______________________________________________________________
> Od: Karl Berry <karl at freefriends.org>
> Komu: <mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com>
> Datum: 10.04.2015 03:47
> Předmět: Re: gentium -> victor?
>
> CC: gentium at tug.org
>- ask Victor for approval (Karl)
>
>I changed ff-gentium.pe to describe Gentium Plus 5.000 as a "major
>update" (per the sil web site) instead of a "maintenance release". I
>suspected that Victor would be happier that way.
>
>However, my version of fontforge is too old to regenerate the pfb's.
>That is, it runs to completion and generates something, but the results
>don't have the same hinting, or many other differences. So I don't want
>to send that to Victor.
>
>So ... Pavel, can you regenerate the pfb's please?
>
>(Also, I see the fontforge version you used dates from 2012. I wouldn't
>be surprised if a newer version had better results in some details. Not
>that I propose that it needs to be tried right now, but something to
>think about for the future.)
>
>thanks,
>k
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ConvertedGentium.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 1995134 bytes
Desc: ConvertedGentium.zip
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/gentium/attachments/20150413/7be8f3dd/attachment-0001.zip>
More information about the gentium
mailing list