On Sunday 12 January 2003 15:23, Philipp Lehman wrote: > I'm CC'ing the list. Maybe Lars has a better idea... Adrian, didn't you say that all glyphs in this font are encoded? So there are absolutely no unencoded glyphs? If this is the case, did you try skipping the reencoding step altogether and going straight to the virtual fonts? Like you do it when dealing with expert fonts? -- Philipp Lehman <lehman@gmx.net>