TUG Unix CD: HTML documentation

[Thomas Esser]

> i am getting very confused over texmf/source and texmf/doc for .dtx
> files. if you take a package with his
>   x.ins
>   x.dtx
>   sample.tex
>   readme

My opinion is:
  x.ins x.dtx                -> texmf/source/latex/<package>
  sample.tex,readme,[x.dvi]  -> texmf/doc/latex/<package>

The reason is: people will look for documentation in texmf/doc and
user documentation should be 'ready to preview/print' in .dvi format.
Sample files are most helpful in source there.

The nature of the .ins/.dtx is more source than documentation as others
already pointed out here.

Thomas