tds 0.100 feedback
Paul Vojta
TWG-TDS@SHSU.edu
Thu, 19 Oct 1995 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu Oct 19 04:01:19 1995,
vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de (Ulrik Vieth) wrote:
>
> *
> This improves the maintainability of the font tree,
> but, unless all the programs that search this tree employ some form of
> caching, there are serious performance concerns. For example, in order
> to find \path|cmr10.tfm|, {\TeX} would potentially have to search
> ^^^
> through all the directories that contain \path|pk| files
> ^^
> in all modes and at all resolutions.
>
> I don't understand this. Is this a mix-up or something?
No, but implementing texmf/fonts/supplier/typeface/type/... would be a mix-up
for the above-mentioned reason. The problem is: how does TeX know that the
dvi file isn't located in some weird place like
texmf/fonts/foo/bar/pk/dpi300/tfm/cmr10.tfm ?
--Paul Vojta, vojta@math.berkeley.edu