[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partial downloading with dvips
Hi:
I believe the problem may be that true Adobe PS interpreters
used in some popular Apple printers made during a certain
period cannot handle more than two elements in the
StemSnapH and StemSnapV lists. This font has:
/StemSnapH [ 19 21 28 33 52 ] ND
/StemSnapV [ 17 18 19 36 39 45 52 129 212 ] ND
There is code one can add to test for printers of this type
and then use shortened lists, but this font does not use this
(tedious) refinement
(there are other problems with this font such as
many reversed contours, and truly chaotic "auto-hinting",
but that should not affect the printer or DVIPS
except in quality of output).
Regards, Berthold.
At 18:25 2000-08-22 -0400, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
Hi Werner,
The short answer is "I don't know!".
That may sound flippant, but the problem is that the subsetting
code
(t1part.c) is very senstive to overly long comments, etc... that
reside in the fonts, and there were some minor bugs in early
versions
on dvips 5.86. I did a fair amount os scrutinizing, and gave up
on
some of the problems (because it would require a *very* robust PS
tokenizer to fix the problem sin t1part.c). Han The Thanh's
writet1.c
is now used for font subsetting, and is more robust than t1part.c.
I suspect that the font you are having problems with was generated
in
Fontographer. If so, use the t1utils tools to disassemble the
font,
clean out the crufty comments in the eexec portion, and add the
line:
0 1 255 {1 index exch /.notdef put} for
immediately after the /Encoding 256 array line.
Then reassemble the font and try again.
If you still have problems, let me know.
Regards,
Tom
P.S. I am forwarding this to the tex-k mailing list, because there
are
others there that might find this useful.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
>
>
> which prerequisites are necessary to make a font partially
> downloadable by dvips? I have a font which works with -j0, but
my old
> Apple printer with an original Adobe PS interpreter rejects
documents
> created with -j1. GhostScript works fine, and pdfTeX also
produces
> results viewable with Acroread.
>
> I'm using the latest teTeX beta with dvipsk 5.86d.
>
>
> Werner
>
--
Berthold K.P. Horn
mailto:bkph@ai.mit.edu
http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/bkph (NC)