[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801

To: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>, "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>, "tex-fonts" <tex-fonts@math.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
From: "Walter Schmidt" <walter.schmidt@arcormail.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 18:34:23 +0200 (MSZ)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.56.19990607121638.019c1b18@mail.ai.mit.edu>
Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Walter Schmidt" <walter.schmidt@arcormail.de>

On Mon, 07 Jun 1999 12:18:09 -0400, Berthold K.P. Horn wrote:

>Could you pass the two TFMs through TFtoPL to see what is different?

the checksum only

Walter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
  - From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

References:
- Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
Next by Date: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
Prev by thread: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
Next by thread: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread