[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CM fonts updated?
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:04:16 +0100, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
>Compared to the AMS version of cmex9, the only significant difference
>it is the font identifier ("CMEX" vs. "CMEX V2.2") and some whitespace
>in the source file, which shouldn't affect the generated fonts at all.
Oh, I should have checked this before complaining. :-(
Yet, thank you for the explanation.
>A similar version conflict also exists for the file ebigof.mf
Oh, this one is really bad!