[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)

To: Berthold Horn <bkph@ai.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
From: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:35:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: Pavel.Janik@inet.cz (Pavel Janik ml.), TeX-fonts list <tex-fonts@csc-sun.math.utah.edu>
Flags: 000000000000
In-Reply-To: <199810141210.IAA15778@life.ai.mit.edu>
References: <"Nelson H. F. Beebe"'s message of Tue, 13 Oct 1998 09:27:14 -0600 (MDT)><CMM.0.91.0.908292434.beebe@plot79.math.utah.edu><m3d87wxp59.fsf@SnowWhite.inet.cz><199810141210.IAA15778@life.ai.mit.edu>

Concernant Ť Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?) ť, Berthold Horn écrit : Ť
ť As I stated before, there is another state that is preserved across jobs:
ť the glyph cache, which is organized on FontName, FontMatrix and
ť UniqueID.  Which is why it is a bad (TM) idea to call a modified font
ť by the same PS FontName as the original.  Some DVI drivers do this...

Are you saying that using a subsetted font without changing its name
could suppress some glyphs for further jobs (like in acrobat)?

That sounds terrific!
Thierry Bouche, Grenoble.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

References:
- Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
  - From: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" <beebe@csc-sun.math.utah.edu>
- Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
  - From: Pavel.Janik@inet.cz (Pavel Janik ml.)
- Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
  - From: Berthold Horn <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
Next by Date: Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
Prev by thread: Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
Next by thread: Re: Printing problem (Conflicting font name?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread