[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN

To: Bernd Anhaeupl <anhaeupl@late.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>, tex-fonts@csc-sun.math.utah.edu
Subject: Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
From: Rebecca and Rowland <rebecca@astrid.u-net.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 04:08:14 +0100
Flags: 000000000000
In-Reply-To: <199807271232.MAA29572@mail-out-4.tiac.net>
References: <199807271037.MAA09988@late5.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>

At 8:32 am -0400 27/7/98, Berthold K.P. Horn wrote:
[snip]
>By the way, consider downloading lw35nfsx.zip instead of lw35nfss.zip
>It is 150k instead of 800k and provides most of the same capabilities
>at much lowered complexity.  And no checksum nightmares between
>VF and TFM, since it doesn't use VF...

Ah - I see.  No vfs so it's nothing like as useful.

Rowland.

References:
- checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
  - From: Bernd Anhaeupl <anhaeupl@late.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>
- Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
Next by Date: Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
Prev by thread: Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
Next by thread: Re: checksum inconsistencies for virtual postscript fonts on CTAN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread