[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fontinst with 8y.etx

To: hshlgaii@mailszrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de
Subject: Re: fontinst with 8y.etx
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 10:01:34 +0100
Cc: fontinst@cogs.susx.ac.uk, tex-fonts@csc-sun.math.utah.edu
Flags: 000000000000
In-Reply-To: <35831C21.DCC@mailszrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de>
References: <35831C21.DCC@mailszrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de>

Hilmar Schlegel writes:
 > > But I stress that I have nothing against 8y. I just remain to be
 > > convinced that the pain of changing will be outweighed by the
 > > possible advantages.
 > 
 > It depends on the purpose: for PDF using scalable fonts and a more
 > reliable encoding is kind of basic requirement (at least presently). 
 > 

I think the jury is still out on whether 8y or 8r is more
`reliable'. Since, as I say, I have not met an encoding problem with
8r and PDF, I wait to be convinced

sebastian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fontinst with 8y.etx
  - From: "Melissa O'Neill" <oneill@cs.sfu.ca>

References:
- Re: fontinst with 8y.etx
  - From: Hilmar Schlegel <hshlgaii@mailszrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: A trigger for buggy Acrobat behaviour
Next by Date: Re: fontname code for scaled variants
Prev by thread: Re: fontinst with 8y.etx
Next by thread: Re: fontinst with 8y.etx
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread