Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS

["Y&Y, Inc." <support@yandy.com>]

At 09:49 AM 3/10/98 -0500, bbeeton wrote:

>many of our authors have *very* *strong* opinions about the shape of
>script letters, and rsfs is closer to their concept of script than
>is anything else readily available.  (but it's a real beast as far
>as placement of subs, sups and diacritics; that's why both knuth's
>calligraphic and the euler script are significantly more vertical.)

Hmm, interesting makes it sound like it ought to be treated as a math font
then so that one can use the bogus metrics used in math fonts to 
position subscripts and superscripts.  Of course, that does mean
using up yet another math family.  Does it make sense to squeeze it
in with another math font (and then have to translate character codes
>From A-Z to wheever it has to fit in the remaining space)?

Regards, Berthold.