Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS

[s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk (Sebastian Rahtz)]

Ulrik Vieth writes:
 > In that case I really wonder what else there is left you are you
 > using?  I mean the whole work of the Math Font Group (*) was based 
 > on the assumption that the choice of math fonts sets usable with 
 > TeX was limitied to a handful of families such as CM, Concrete, 
 > Euler, Adobe Symbol, MathTime, Lucida New Math, and Mathematica.
who is talking about TeX? i was talking about the typesetters who
produce the majority of our printed material. they dont use TeX.

 > 
 > The distinction between Script and Calligraphic is very muddled,
 > but it exists.
yes, but is that distinction "mainstream" or in very specialized
circles?

sebastian