[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rowland oddity (wasRe: fontinst oddity)

To: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>
Subject: Re: Rowland oddity (wasRe: fontinst oddity)
From: Rebecca and Rowland <rebecca@astrid.u-net.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:31:35 +0000
Cc: TeX founts mailing list <tex-fonts@csc-sun.math.utah.edu>
Flags: 000000000000
In-Reply-To: <199802061549.QAA26677@mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr>
References: <l03110700b100be288602@[194.119.133.25]><l03110700b100be288602@[194.119.133.25]>

At 4:49 pm +0100 6/2/98, Thierry Bouche wrote:
>why the hell do you use OT1tt?!

Because I'm very stupid, obviously.  Thanks.

>if it's tt encoding, then it has no ligatures, and you know for sure
>that en/m-dashes are produced by ligatures from --/-. Didn't you
>notice the absence of fi lig too.

[snip]

Yes, that was bothering me a bit.

I'll just wander off and shoot myself, shall I?

Rowland.

References:
- fontinst oddity
  - From: Rebecca and Rowland <rebecca@astrid.u-net.com>
- Rowland oddity (wasRe: fontinst oddity)
  - From: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>

Prev by Date: Rowland oddity (wasRe: fontinst oddity)
Next by Date: A less stupid fontinst question
Prev by thread: Rowland oddity (wasRe: fontinst oddity)
Next by thread: A less stupid fontinst question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread