[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: fj@cs.auc.dk*Subject*: Re: MF ==> (PS type1)*From*: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>*Date*: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 12:00:58 -0500 (EST)*CC*: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie, metafont@ens.fr, tex-fonts@math.utah.edu*Flags*: 000000000000*In-reply-to*: <199703111601.RAA11342@micro.cs.auc.dk> (message from FrankJensen on Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:01:21 +0100 (MET))*Reply-to*: bkph@ai.mit.edu

Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:01:21 +0100 (MET) From: Frank Jensen <fj@cs.auc.dk> CC: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie, metafont@ens.fr, tex-fonts@math.utah.edu bkph> [math fonts] bkph> >Sorry, that is just not so. There are three choices right now, bkph> bkph> Four if you include Euler as a separate font (see current issue of GUTenberg). bkph> bkph> Hmm, people keep on saying that, but there is no Euler math font set. bkph> Only EUEX. You have to use it with basic CM math fonts. This is in direct contradiction to the information given at the BSR and Y&Y web sites. So what is the truth? Could you explain? I do not know what the contradiction is? Yes, the AMS font set exists in Type 1 format. Yes, it includes Euler fonts. But you use it *with* CM fonts for basic math, it just *extends* it. I must have somehow missed the point.... --- Frank Jensen, fj@cs.auc.dk Department of Computer Science Aalborg University DENMARK

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)***From:*Frank Jensen <fj@cs.auc.dk>

**References**:**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)***From:*Frank Jensen <fj@cs.auc.dk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Next by Date:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Prev by thread:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Next by thread:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Index(es):