[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: bkph@ai.mit.edu*Subject*: Re: Unicode and math symbols*From*: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>*Date*: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:05:31 GMT*Cc*: mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch, BNB@math.ams.org, tex-font@math.utah.edu*Flags*: 000000000000*In-Reply-To*: <199702282126.QAA08485@kauai.ai.mit.edu>*References*: <Pine.SUN.3.95q.970228221029.248T-100000@enoshima> <199702282126.QAA08485@kauai.ai.mit.edu>

Berthold wrote -- > If the UNICODE consortium decides it may be a mess, but everyone > will be dealing with the *same* mess. It may well be that for many purposes some standard, even a bad one, is better than no standard. But this one will be a mess that cannot (and is not intended to) support typography (on any medium);s o there does not seem, much point in the providers of such systems spending time on being involved in making this mess. chris

**References**:**Re: Unicode and math symbols***From:*"Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>

**Re: Unicode and math symbols***From:*"Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Unicode and math symbols** - Next by Date:
**Re: Unicode and math symbols** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Unicode and math symbols** - Next by thread:
**Re: Unicode and math symbols** - Index(es):