Re: Unicode and math symbols

[Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>]

Martin

> 
> Please note that for one area where you would assume that
> dealing with "meaning" would be especially easy, the
> character/glyph model that is the general base of
> Unicode/ISO 10646 had to be changed somewhat (to
> come closer to "glyph" than for other scripts) to
> accomodate for present practice and user expectations.

Sounds interesting: to what do you refer?

> Similar things may apply to math (or may not apply).

Indeed: See next message:-).


chris