# Re: psnfss and lw35nfss



Concernant « Re: psnfss and lw35nfss », Berthold K.P. Horn écrit :

> After all what are called PostScript'
> fonts on comp.text.tex are called ATM fonts' in the rest of the
> world, and while ATM provides better by far rasterization than any
> PS interpreter - public domain or commercial - ATM does not include
> a PS interpreter and so cannot handle PS trickery'.

how would you call AJenson, then ? an ATM4+ font ? and MinionMM
ATM3.02 font ? It was definitely not an ATM2 font. No doubt this
dotlessj will be an ATM-300\varepsilon font!

I am not sure I get your point.  Like some things aren't supported by
PS level 1, does that mean something? Like level 2 is evil?

Also, ATM has no trouble with dotlessj if (1) the font has it
and (2) the TeX system knows how to reencode the font on the fly.

`