[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Encodings, Non-T1 symbols, and bitmapped fonts... -Reply
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Encodings, Non-T1 symbols, and bitmapped fonts... -Reply
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Alan Jeffrey)
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 95 17:39 BST
- CC: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <sfe5809d.066@ELSEVIER.CO.UK> (message from Sebastian Rahtz on Mon, 19 Jun 1995 13:52:12 +0100)
>What I dont see is why this affects someone
>choosing to set their text in 8r rather than T1 at a document
Using just 8r will work. Using just T1 will work. Mixing both (eg
using T1 for CM fonts and 8r for PS fonts) is a problem.
>If you dont use that, why do people want to use
In order to access all those neat new glyphs like <onehalf> which
should really be accessed via a TS encoding.