[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Undeclared glyphs -Reply
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Undeclared glyphs -Reply
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 13:33:11 +0100
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk
>I did say that this is because of a problem with TeX. T1 and
>OT1 can coexist because T1 was carefully planned to be
>compatible with OT1.
>The problems arise when using two 8-bit encodings, both
>of which contain letters, within one paragraph. Thus the
why would one want to mix T1 and 8r? i am sorry, Chris, but
i really dont understand the point you are making.
>The other, comparitively trivial problem, is that `8r' is not
>a good name for a LaTeX font encoding (I suspect that the
>name was chosen to show that it would not be used as one)
no, the name comes from the "other" naming system, of
Karl Berry. its a very great shame the two are not the same!
> since LaTeX will need a file called 8r... and filenames
>cannot begin with non-letters on many operating systems.
>Thus the production of 8r.sty etc is a highly anti-social act
>for more than one reason.
come come, lets keep this in perspective. "highly
anti-social" is harsh words for a formalization of what
many people have been doing for years, and will carry on
doing in the future!
>It seems like, Karl Berry does seem to think that using 8r
>directly *is* okay and should be supported [to some
dont forget plain TeX people; they can use 8r if they like,
without any thought police problems :-}
>> which says that this is supported.
>Such actions horrify me!
more than the war in Bosnia?
>> > Pondering,
>How we got into this sorry mess, perhaps??
i think it would help all concerned if you explained
why its so bad to use
"whatever-encoding-name-one-gave-8r", other than that T1
is the standard?