[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Undeclared glyphs -Reply
- To: s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk
- Subject: RE: Undeclared glyphs -Reply
- From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 22:30:20 +0100
- Cc: tex-fonts@math.utah.edu, C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk
>
> I should stress Alan's point that 8r is not a supported encoding in terms
> of the LaTeX project. Since we have the base fonts, we wanted to make
> them useable, but the LaTeX2e official line is that you use T1 or OT1 (and
> any future symbol encoding).
Sebastian seems to imply that this is just a whim of the LaTeX3 team
to support only 2 encodings. In fact, TeX unfotunately makes it practically
impossible to support any more than one encoding so this is not an
"official line" but a necessity. This one need not ne T1 but it has
to be some arbitrary one and T1, despite its deficiencies, was agreed
as a TeX standard long before LaTeX had any support for encodings.
Chris Rowley --- On behalf of The LaTeX3 Project Team