[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
>From schrod Thu Jun 6 20:27:12 1991 remote from itipcs2
Subject: Re: cryptic scheme for mode_def names in modes.mf
To: email@example.com (Karl Berry)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 91 20:27:12 MSZ
In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "Karl Berry" at Jun 6, 91 11:38 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL0]
As long as the aliasses are still kept (for those souls who just want
to produce all fonts for a device with one mode_def) you can name the
mode_def IMHO what you want.
The contents count, and if such an *internal* name makes the life
easier for the one who has to maintain modes.mf -- why not?
btw, Chris Rowley (I think he's well known) asked me if he may join
the discussion on this list. His email address is
Will somebody (Nelson?) please add him?
Joachim Schrod Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Computer Science Department
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany