[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright zzzz
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Copyright zzzz
- From: Ulrik Vieth <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 17:42:40 +0100
- CC: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <36B5D3B4.55558DDC@cs.depaul.edu> (message from Alan Jeffrey onMon, 01 Feb 1999 10:17:56 -0600)
> At the moment the fontinst software is distributed under a copyright
> notice, but no real distribution agreement. (With the prodding of
> Sebastian) I'd like to move over to the LaTeX license, i.e. open source,
> but with the proviso that any changes in the source must be matched by a
> change in the name of the software. So people can distribute a
> `myfontinst' all they like, just not under the name `fontinst'.
> Any thoughts on this? In particular from the people who've contributed
> code/documentation over the years?
I have no objections in principle, but this leaves the question of who
is going to maintain the "official" version of fontinst. After I have
taken care of the last releases (1.800 and 1.801 last year), I have
unfortunately been unable to keep up with all the suggested fixes and
patches, and there seem to a few remaining issues to be looked at.
Lars Hellström seems to have been working on quite a few patches and/or
improvements, but was reluctant to take over maintenance and put out
a new release himself. So, what shall we do about it?