[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: rounding problems
- To: Alan Jeffrey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: rounding problems
- From: Rebecca and Rowland <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 00:36:45 +0100
- Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-Reply-To: <21ED223BA921D21182F200104B751D88157B9F@bach.cs.depaul.edu>
>Well, if I was going to do it over again I'd use perl, but it's too late
I for one am very glad you used TeX, not Perl. Perl is far too
system-dependent for my liking: fontinst written in TeX `just works'. By
contrast, the vfinst Perl scripts don't work on my Mac at all, despite me
> At the time I needed a language with good scripting facilities, and
>TeX's macro language looked quite reasonable. And it means it runs on any
>TeX-aware site (blah blah usual advertizing stuff here).
That feature alone is worth all the hassle with TeX's eccentric way of
>» For anyone who's wondering why the code does this in the first place,
>» because otherwise you get overflow errors by multiplying a dimen by a
>» scalefactor > 1000 (TeX doesn't support fp multiplication, you have to
>» multiply by an int then divide by another int).
>That's one of TeX's features that make me sometimes wonder whether TeX
>really the language of choice for a software like fontinst...
What amazes me about TeX is that someone like Knuth could write something
that's as bad at arithmetic as TeX is.