[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this a bug?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 15:28:28 +0100
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <3576B569.8316DB6F@cs.depaul.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Rebecca and Rowland writes:
> (If you're using OzTeX, you can increase any of TeX's memory parameters by
> changing the appropriate number in the config file; I set mem_top and
> mem_max to 400000 and it seems happy. No need to ensure you've got a
just like Unix web2c, then
> particular version of anything; vptovf and pltotf are big enough too. Just
> to have a pointless dig at Sebastian: why you lot insist on using that
> awkward-to-use Unix beats me.)
i find it hard to believe that Andrew has made the sizes in vptovf
dynamic. you probably just haven't hit one of the pathologically kerned
> Firstly, that fontinst seemed to be running something like 1/5 of the speed
> I'd seen previously. Have the recent modifications slowed it down, or
> should I look for another cause?
its age. fontinst was at its peak at the same time as Gascoigne. years of
alcohol abuse and associating with low lifes.