[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Behaviour of \latinfamily
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Behaviour of \latinfamily
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:20:02 +0100
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-Reply-To: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <6720-Tue26May1998103412firstname.lastname@example.org> <1562-Tue26May1998134654email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Rebecca and Rowland writes:
> The problem is that TeX code is *very* difficult to follow. If there were
the success of TeX over the last 15 years would tend to prove you
wrong, surely? people swap code all the time. not as extreme as
fontinst, usually, but sometimes
> 1) What calls \latin_shapes and when.
> 2) What \latin_shapes does.
surely thats exactly what Ulrik just explained?????