<html>
<body>
At 09:41 AM 1/31/2006, D. P. Story wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I don't see any advantage in
changing from YandY to MiKTeX. The<br>
dvipreview is far superior to Yap, incorporating new fonts is<br>
tirival, the dvipsone is fast and produces excellent
ps.</blockquote></blockquote><br>
Perhaps someone can help me here. I have been using MikTeX and
eventually I hope to produce pdf ready for a publisher for their printer
(I have ADOBE products for pdf making). When you say that YandY
produces excellent ps, does that mean I would not be able to produce the
best quality pdf if I stay with MikTeX? By the way, in
MikTeX, the preview seems acceptable to me while incorporation of new
fonts is a major challenge. <br><br>
Ashim Datta<br><br>
PS: I bought YandY, had incredibly rude behavior from YandY as I needed
help in installing. In contrast, my students have been able to
install and work with MikTeX with very little problems.<br><br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=2 color="#0000FF">
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||<br>
Ashim K. Datta<br>
<i>Professor, Cornell University <br>
</i>Dept. of Biological and Environmental Engineering <br>
Riley-Robb Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA <br>
Tel: (607)255-2482; Fax: (607)255-4080 <br>
</font><font size=2 color="#FF0000">
<a href="http://www.bee.cornell.edu/datta" eudora="autourl">
http://www.bee.cornell.edu/datta<br>
</a></font><font size=2 color="#0000FF">
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||</font>
</body>
</html>