<font size="1">Hear, hear.</font><font size="1"><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTIzNzI2MTY5" target="_blank"></a> The voice of reason. <br><br>There's really no point in editor-wars. As Phil rightly says, the choice of editing program is intensely personal. It's often determined by all sorts of factors that aren't obviously logical. Much the best thing is to remain neutral and helpful, by emphasizing the importance of Unicode capability, and by mentioning that some users find other features useful, like syntax highlighting, command completion or online (La)TeX help. There's no right answer to the "which editor?" question.<br>
<br>Dominik<br></font><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 September 2010 21:26, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk">P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br><br></div>
I've tried to stay out of this, but I can't :-(<br>
<br>
The choice of editor is an intensely personal one, and all that<br>
a document such as XeLshort should say is "Use your preferred<br>
editor so long as it is capable of handling Unicode; editors that<br>
we know can handle Unicode successfully are listed in Appendix <whatever>."<br>
<br>
** Phil.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------------<br>
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:<br>
<a href="http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>