Guys! I have access to that font(DV-TTSurekh-Normal). As far as I know it is said that font is made in 1996-97. And it in no way a Unicode OpenType Font. It is an ASCII hack font for Devanagari. The Devanagari glyph are draw in latin names. So, for example when you type a you will get क as glyph of a. So just telling fontspec the font name will not work of that font as I know.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Arthur Reutenauer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org">arthur.reutenauer@normalesup.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">> Now that you mention it, it might be--I didn't pay attention to the date<br>
> below. I think the Unicode Devanagari block is pretty old, but it might<br>
> not be that old.<br>
<br>
</div> Of course it's older, it was already in Unicode 1.1 in 1993 (the<br>
version of Unicode that was unified with ISO 10646) -- and most likely<br>
in Unicode 1.0 in 1991, but I don't have access to that. Devanagari is<br>
one of the most important scripts in the world, it was there from the<br>
beginning.<br>
<br>
Not that this says anything about your font, obviously. What the date<br>
*does* say about the font, though, is that it's most likely simple<br>
TrueType, not OpenType, as OpenType was still in limbo at this time.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Arthur<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------------<br>
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:<br>
<a href="http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Ujjwol Lamichhane<br><a href="http://ujjwol.com.np/">http://ujjwol.com.np/</a><br><br>