<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div class="h5">
<br>
</div></div>Thanks, Vafa, bidi has changed so quickly that I had an old version left<br>
on my local tree that I'd overlooked. As soon as that was deleted,<br>
everything worked fine. Reminder to self: clean up TeX tree more often.<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>There is also a new version coming out sometimes before the next year in which we have a change of license as follow:<br><br>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%<br><br> Copyright © 2009–2010 Vafa Khalighi <<a href="mailto:vafakhlgh@gmail.com">vafakhlgh@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br> It may be distributed and/or modified under the LaTeX Project Public License,<br> version 1.3c or higher (your choice). The latest version of<br> this license is at: <a href="http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt">http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt</a><br>
<br> This work is “author-maintained” (as per LPPL maintenance status)<br> by Vafa Khalighi.<br> <br> In addition to the terms of LPPL any distributed version<br> (unchanged or modified) of bidi has to keep the statement<br>
about the moral obligation for using bidi. In case of major<br> changes where this would not be appropriate the author of the<br> changed version should contact the copyright holder.<br> <br> Moral obligation for using bidi:<br>
____________________________________<br> <br> Users of bidi who wish to include or use bidi or a modified<br> version in a proprietary and commercially market product are asked<br> under certain conditions (see below) for the payment of a license<br>
fee. The size of this fee is to be determined, in each instance,<br> by the commercial user, depending on his/her judgment of the value of<br> bidi for his/her product.<br> <br> The conditions for this are as follows:<br>
<br> The producer of a proprietary and commercially market product<br> that involves typesetting using bidi is asked to determine<br> the value of a license fee for using bidi if<br> <br> - the product is a document and the producer has decided to<br>
include bidi to typeset (parts of) the document or has<br> directed the author of the document to include bidi (for<br> example, by providing a class file to be used by the author)<br> <br> - the product is a LaTeX class or package that includes bidi<br>
<br> There is no moral obligation in case<br> <br> - the product is a document but producer has not directed<br> the author to include bidi (in that case the moral obligation<br> lies with the author of the document)<br>
<br> - the product does not involve typesetting, e.g., consists, for<br> example, of distributing bidi and its documentation.<br> <br> - the product is not proprietary, i.e., is made available as free<br> software itself (which doesn't prohibit its commercial marketing)<br>
<br> - bidi is used for non-commercial purposes<br> <br> Determinating a license fee might result in a license fee of zero<br> (i.e., no payment) in case a producer has determined that the use<br> of bidi has no enhancing effect on the product. This is a<br>
plausible scenario, i.e., in the above two cases the producer is<br> only asked to evaluate the value of bidi for the product<br> not for the payment of a license fee per se (which might or might<br> not follow from this evaluation).<br>
<br> The license fee, if any, can be payed to the author of<br> the program who can be contacted at<br> <br> <a href="mailto:vafakhlgh@gmail.com">vafakhlgh@gmail.com</a><br></div></div><br>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="rtl">به نام خداوند جان و خرد کزین برتر اندیشه برنگذرد<br><br></div></div><br>
</div>