Not really. The glyphs in the mathematical alphabets have different shapes to the glyphs in the text alphabets. I believe unicode-math is able to define the alphabets (I don't actually know, but I can't imagine any hindrance), with or without OpenType math tables, so using unicode-math would be superior to using mathspec here.<br>
<br>Andrew<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 31 May 2010 01:31, Michael Lynch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael.s.lynch@googlemail.com">michael.s.lynch@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
If you were to use the STIX fonts in the meantime, given the lack of OpenType features in the STIX release, does it make more sense to use mathspec instead of unicode-math?</blockquote></div>