<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><div>As noted, because bidi isn't the creator of the PDF file and still claims it is. "Created by Xe(La)TeX with bidi package" (something like "Created by LaTeX with hyperref package") would be a little bit more acceptable, don't you think?<br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Vafa Khalighi <vafa@users.berlios.de><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms <xetex@tug.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thu, March 11, 2010 12:33:03 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight:
bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [XeTeX] PDF Creator: "bidi"?<br></font><br>
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div><br>This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's very unfair to declare it as creator application instead of xe(la)tex.<br>
</div>
</div><br></div></blockquote></div><br>I have done this because someone in the past requested it. Why is this unfair? <br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best wishes,<br>Vafa Khalighi<br>
</div>
</div></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>