<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:30 AM, George N. White III <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gnwiii@gmail.com">gnwiii@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Vafa Khalighi<<a href="mailto:vafa@users.berlios.de">vafa@users.berlios.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Also see <a href="http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2008-November/019016.html" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2008-November/019016.html</a> and<br>
> <a href="http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2008-November/019017.html" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2008-November/019017.html</a><br>
<br>
</div>Have you tried TL2009? Unicode-math has been working for me with Asana<br>
in Ubuntu-9.04 (64-bit). If the 64-bit binaries have prpblems, you can<br>
probably use i386-linux xetex binaries in 64bit linux:<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>I really have not tried TL2009 on 64bit Linux but you have and it seems the bug is fixed which makes me very happy. I actually have Ubuntu (i386) at home and Fedora (x86_64) at work. I should try latest version of XeTeX on my fedora machine.<br>
<br>Thanks <br></div></div><br></div>