xunicode seems to work (for me anyway) in that particular (Adobe Garamond Pro) case, though. <br><br>as ever,<br>Rembrandt<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:14, Ulrike Fischer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:news3@nililand.de">news3@nililand.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Am Wed, 6 May 2009 16:13:51 +0530 schrieb Shrisha Rao:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> Greetz.<br>
><br>
> For some reason, the usual \d{} command of LaTeX produces an erroneous<br>
> symbol when used with the Adobe Garamond Pro font. The plain (non-<br>
> Adobe) Garamond screws up even the overlines. Latin Modern Roman<br>
> shows both perfectly (as do Computer Modern, Palatino, and the<br>
> classical LaTeX fonts). Attached is an example showing this problem.<br>
> Any suggestions welcome. TIA.<br>
<br>
</div></div>That's a known problem. xunicode declares a certain definition for<br>
\d (and other accents commands) which can fail if the font doesn't<br>
contain the necessary glyph(s). See e.g. the following discussion<br>
from january:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2009-January/011701.html" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2009-January/011701.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Ulrike Fischer<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
XeTeX mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:postmaster@tug.org">postmaster@tug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex" target="_blank">http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> 人有不為也而後可有為<br>