Hi,<br><br> Thanks for all your replies. I hadn't noticed that \XeTeXlinebreakskip already enables me to get a reasonable line-break and stretchability. Thank you, Akira.<br><br> Also looking forward to new spacing rules in the future. Many thanks for Jonathan Kew and any other contributors who has made efforts to this good typesetting system.
<br><br> Best regards!<br><br> Dian YIN<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/2/9, Akira Kakuto <<a href="mailto:kakuto@fsci.fuk.kindai.ac.jp">kakuto@fsci.fuk.kindai.ac.jp
</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br><br>> Without glues between Chinese characters it's quite easy
<br>> to have overfull or underfull boxes in a line ...<br><br>I don't know Chinese, but please try, for example<br><br>\XeTeXlinebreaklocale "zh_CN"<br>\XeTeXlinebreakskip=0em plus 0.1em minus 0.01em<br>
\XeTeXlinebreakpenalty=0<br><br>(line ending should be %LF)<br><br>Best regards,<br>Akira<br>_______________________________________________<br>XeTeX mailing list<br><a href="mailto:postmaster@tug.org">postmaster@tug.org</a>
<br><a href="http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex">http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex</a><br></blockquote></div><br>