[XeTeX] FakeBold vs TikZ

[Zdenek Wagner]

2014-06-18 6:21 GMT+02:00 Herbert Schulz <herbs at wideopenwest.com>:

>
> On Jun 17, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:53:40AM +1000, Ross Moore wrote:
> >> It seems that one cannot break up the processing any more,
> >> or at least not in the simple-minded way.
> >> Would one of the developers please explain how to do this
> >> kind of testing now.
> >
> > So called "native" fonts (AKA non-TFM fonts) are now stored in the XDV
> > files using their full path not font name, so you can't process XDV
> > files using such fonts uless you have fonts in the exact same location
> > (but whether this relates to the error you are seeing or not, I don't
> > no).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Khaled
>
> Howdy,
>
> Another Hmmm... I have the Latin Modern otf fonts set up as System Fonts
> (in ~/Library/Fonts). Could that be the reason I don't see the dot in
> either TL2013 or TL2014?
>

Me too. In my Linux I have  texmf-var/fonts/conf/texlive-fontconfig.conf
symlinked to /etc/fonts/conf.d and thus I can see LM fonts in all
applications. I have the dots in TL 2010, 2011, 2012 and no dots in 2008,
2009, 2013, 2014 pretest.

>
> Good Luck,
>
> Herb Schulz
> (herbs at wideopenwest dot com)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>   http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>



-- 
Zdeněk Wagner
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20140618/ce2c28f1/attachment.html>