[XeTeX] Problem with Unicode 01F01B
Khaled Hosny
khaledhosny at eglug.org
Tue Dec 18 18:51:13 CET 2012
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:59:34AM -0600, mskala at ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > For a couple of releases now, XeTeX will always put the absolute path
> > of the font in the XDV to avoid the recurrent problem with XeTeX and
>
> Does this make XDV files non-portable? It may be that getting the correct
> font, in the usual case of the XDV being generated and used immediately
> through a pipe on the same machine, is important enough that this is the
> Right Thing to do. But I am currently generating and using XDV files in
> separate steps on a single machine, and it's not hard to imagine someone
> wanting to do those in separate steps on separate machines.
AFAIK, XDV have never been considered a portable format (neither is
DVI, device independent and portable are two different concepts).
> Device-independent files are no longer device-independent if they're tied
> to one host's filesystem.
Check the 4th paragraph in this interview for what device independence
actually meant:
http://www.tug.org/interviews/fuchs.html
Regards,
Khaled
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list