[XeTeX] Polyglossia "broken"?

Dominik Wujastyk wujastyk at gmail.com
Sun Oct 2 13:36:19 CEST 2011


there seem to be two git versions of polyglossia, i.e., it's been forked.
Or am I wrong?  Philipp's and Francois'



On 1 October 2011 23:52, Alan Munn <amunn at gmx.com> wrote:

> On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Alan Munn wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If anyone knows how to work git (I use it so rarely that I always have
> to start from scratch) then feel free to add this to the git hub.  If anyone
> wishes to package this for CTAN, please do so.
> >
> > I've added the change to the git version.  The question is whether
> Françcois (or the other person with commit permissions has the time to merge
> the change and upload the new version.)
>
>
> Actually, Philipp has already proposed the same change to the git version.
>
> Alan
>
> --
> Alan Munn
> amunn at gmx.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20111002/cb46c230/attachment.html>


More information about the XeTeX mailing list