[XeTeX] XeTeX in lshort
Tobias Schoel
liesdiedatei at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 29 21:14:31 CEST 2010
Hi,
I wouldn't recommend anything other than kile for linux users. for me it
offers the fastest way of texing.
I tried emacs when we got the task of learning and testing a bit of lisp
in university, but I didn't get the feeling "I'm becoming better and
using this program seems to be an improvement." soon enough. That's why
it should be mentioned but not recommenend for beginners: It's a
paedagogical rule: don't change content and form simultaneously. (German
speakers can read: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proaktive_Hemmung )
Toscho
Am 28.09.2010 22:44, schrieb Philipp Stephani:
> Am 28.09.2010 um 21:16 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
>
>>
>> Am 28.09.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Tobias Schoel:
>>
>>> Can we now come back to the beginning problem:
>>> Which way of creating unicode-encoded .tex-documents to propose in lshort?
>>
>> Using GNU Emacs 23.x – the Unicode Emacs (and any of its variants) – with its AUCTeX extension.
>
> I use the same technology, but I would never recommend it to beginners. It doesn't help if you have to learn LaTeX/ConTeXt *and* Emacs at the same time.
> TeXworks seems to be a modern, Unicode-capable solution, and AFAIK it is included in TeX Live. Thus the recommendation should be TeX Shop on OS X and TeXworks on Windows and Linux. AFAIK TeXworks has been modelled after TeX Shop, which should simplify the explanations.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list