[XeTeX] XeTeX Digest, Vol 75, Issue 34

ashok kumar khanda khandaashok at rediffmail.com
Mon Jun 14 04:04:06 CEST 2010


Dear Sir,
I am using latex in windows environment. I have some problem . I am not able to setup the following table in a A4 size paper
Please help me.

\begin{table}
\caption{Energy Contributions $(\triangle E_B)_{cm}, (\triangle E_B)_g, (\delta M_B)_\chi$ and physical masses $(M_B)$ of ground
state baryons in MeV.}
 
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
  % after \\: \hline or \cline{col1-col2} \cline{col3-col4} ...
  {} &{} & {} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$(\triangle E_B)_g$}    & {} &{}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{$M_B$}  \\
\cline{4-6} \cline{8-9}
  Baryon & $E_B$ & $(\triangle E_B)_{cm}$ & $(\triangle E_B)^m_g$ & $(\triangle E_B)^e_g$ & Total & $(\delta M_B)_\chi$ & Calculation & Expt.
  \\\hline
  N & 1507.335& -191.467 & -99.851 & 0 & -99.851 & -276.017 & 940 & 940 \\
  \hline
  $\triangle$ & 1507.335 & -191.467 & 99.851 & 0 & 99.851 &-183.719 & 1232 & 1232
  \\ \hline
  $\Lambda$ & 1622.074 & -192.833 & -99.851 & -46.769 &-146.62& -166.621 & 1116 & 1116
  \\ \hline
  $\sum$ & 1622.074 & -192.833 & -91.938 & -46.769 & -138.707 &-97.718 & 1192.816 & 1193
  \\ \hline
  $\sum^*$ & 1622.074 & -192.833 & 95.893 & -46.769 &49.124& -97.718 & 1380.647 & 1385
  \\ \hline
  $\Xi$ & 1736.812 & -193.996 & -90.312 & -46.769 & -137.081& -82.537 & 1323.198 & 1321
  \\ \hline
  $\Xi^*$ & 1736.812 & -193.996 & 97.516 & -46.769 & 50.747 & -82.537 & 1517.026 & 1533
  \\ \hline
  $\Omega^-$ & 1851.551 & -194.999 & 104.719 & 0 & 104.719& -79.139 & 1682.132 & 1672
  \\ \hline
 
\end{tabular}
%\end{center}
\end{table}

 
ashok kumar khanda


On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:27:07 +0530  wrote
>Send XeTeX mailing list submissions to

xetex at tug.org



To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

xetex-request at tug.org



You can reach the person managing the list at

xetex-owner at tug.org



When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

than "Re: Contents of XeTeX digest..."





Today's Topics:



  1. Re: bidi v1.1.0 (ali kalami)

  2. xdvipdfmx and PDF/A requirements (Dino Petrucci)

  3. Re: bidi v1.1.0 (Mehdi Omidali)

  4. Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug? (David Purton)

  5. Re: Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug? (Avi Wollman)





----------------------------------------------------------------------



Message: 1

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:02:27 +0430

From: ali kalami 

To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms 

Subject: Re: [XeTeX] bidi v1.1.0

Message-ID:



Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"



???? ?? ???

?? ?? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?????

???? ?????

???? ???

???? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???

?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???

???? ?????

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: 



------------------------------



Message: 2

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:37:09 +0200 (CEST)

From: Dino Petrucci 

To: xetex at tug.org

Subject: [XeTeX] xdvipdfmx and PDF/A requirements

Message-ID:



Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8"



I was not able to find anything about xdvipdfmx and PDF/A. For me, there are 

two problems, at least, I can't solve:



1. the driver doesn't create the /ID tag in the PDF trailer, which is 

mandatory for PDF/A (this can't be done in a TeX document);



2. the driver always changes PDF Info's Producer (e.g. "xdvipdfmx (0.7.8)"), 

but this is a problem with XMP schemas (that are built in a Xe[La]TeX document 

and, therefore, should be independent of the driver version).



These problems have been solved in pdfTeX but not in (x)dvipdfmx, I think.

Thanks.



Dino Petrucci







------------------------------



Message: 3

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:14:58 +0430

From: Mehdi Omidali 

To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms 

Subject: Re: [XeTeX] bidi v1.1.0

Message-ID:



Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8



Hi,

Seems that you send this email to the wrong place (or person). The

default language of this list is english.

Mehdi



On 6/13/10, ali kalami  wrote:

> ???? ?? ???

> ?? ?? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?????

> ???? ?????

> ???? ???

> ???? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???

> ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???

> ???? ?????

>







------------------------------



Message: 4

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:51:50 +1000

From: David Purton 

To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms 

Subject: [XeTeX] Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug?

Message-ID: 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"



Hi,



Just wondering if this is a possible bug:



I was looking through the SBL Hebrew manual

(http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBLHebrewUserManual1.5x.pdf) and noticed

that one of the tricky combinations mentioned in the manual is not

rendered correctly. The particular character in question is the alef on

page 7 of the manual. The SBL Hebrew font is available from

http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBL_Hbrw.ttf



No combinations I entered gave the correct rendering. Looking at the

font, it looks like there are some unmapped glyphs designed to cater for

this and similar cases. Initially I wondered if the ZWJ was a kludge,

but it does seem to appear in at least some copies of the WLC codex

online. Others use the same character ordering, but without the ZWJ.



My file versions:



This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)

xltxtra: 2009/09/02 v0.5

xunicode: 2008/02/08 v0.91

fontspec: 2008/08/09 v1.18

bidi: v1.1.1, , 2010/07/25





Minimal sample file showing various character orderings possible,

incuding the one with the ZWJ mentioned in the manual.





\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{xltxtra}

\usepackage{bidi}

\newfontfamily\hebrewfont[Script=Hebrew,Contextuals=Alternate,Ligatures=Required]{SBL Hebrew}

\begin{document}

\hebrewfont\setRL

?????\quad % alef + hataf patah + ZWJ + meteg + dehi (From SBL Hebrew manual)

????\quad % alef + hataf patah + meteg + dehi

????\quad % alef + hataf patah + dehi + meteg

????\quad % alef + meteg + hataf patah + dehi

????\quad % alef + meteg + dehi + hataf patah

????\quad % alef + dehi + hataf patah + meteg

????   % alef + dehi + meteg + hataf + meteg

\end{document}





Questions:



Is there a fontspec option I am missing to enable correct rendering in

this case?



Can others confirm that this is a problem (in case some of my files are

too old)?



Any comments on how XeLaTeX/fontspec should behave? It would make sense

to me for at least the first two options in the minimal file above to

render correctly, since I do not understand why the ZWJ would be

necessary other than as a kludge... but I am very ignorant, so they may

be a good reason. Other parts of the SBL Hebrew manual talk about the

font being able to render correctly pointing and cantilation in any

order. However, I don't understand how and when normalisation should

occur.





cheers



David



-- 

David Purton

dcpurton at marshwiggle.net

 

For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to

strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him.

                 2 Chronicles 16:9a

-------------- next part --------------

A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Name: not available

Type: application/pgp-signature

Size: 189 bytes

Desc: Digital signature

URL: 



------------------------------



Message: 5

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:01:18 +0300

From: Avi Wollman 

To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms 

Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug?

Message-ID:



Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"



looks okay by me.

miktex 2.8 (windows 7x64)

This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTeX 2.8)









Avi



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:51 PM, David Purton wrote:



> Hi,

>

> Just wondering if this is a possible bug:

>

> I was looking through the SBL Hebrew manual

> (http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBLHebrewUserManual1.5x.pdf) and noticed

> that one of the tricky combinations mentioned in the manual is not

> rendered correctly. The particular character in question is the alef on

> page 7 of the manual. The SBL Hebrew font is available from

> http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBL_Hbrw.ttf

>

> No combinations I entered gave the correct rendering. Looking at the

> font, it looks like there are some unmapped glyphs designed to cater for

> this and similar cases. Initially I wondered if the ZWJ was a kludge,

> but it does seem to appear in at least some copies of the WLC codex

> online. Others use the same character ordering, but without the ZWJ.

>

> My file versions:

>

> This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)

> xltxtra: 2009/09/02 v0.5

> xunicode: 2008/02/08 v0.91

> fontspec: 2008/08/09 v1.18

> bidi: v1.1.1, , 2010/07/25

>

>

> Minimal sample file showing various character orderings possible,

> incuding the one with the ZWJ mentioned in the manual.

>

>

> \documentclass{article}

> \usepackage{xltxtra}

> \usepackage{bidi}

> \newfontfamily\hebrewfont[Script=Hebrew,Contextuals=Alternate,Ligatures=Required]{SBL

> Hebrew}

> \begin{document}

> \hebrewfont\setRL

> ?????\quad % alef + hataf patah + ZWJ + meteg + dehi (From SBL Hebrew

> manual)

> ????\quad % alef + hataf patah + meteg + dehi

> ????\quad % alef + hataf patah + dehi + meteg

> ????\quad % alef + meteg + hataf patah + dehi

> ????\quad % alef + meteg + dehi + hataf patah

> ????\quad % alef + dehi + hataf patah + meteg

> ????   % alef + dehi + meteg + hataf + meteg

> \end{document}

>

>

> Questions:

>

> Is there a fontspec option I am missing to enable correct rendering in

> this case?

>

> Can others confirm that this is a problem (in case some of my files are

> too old)?

>

> Any comments on how XeLaTeX/fontspec should behave? It would make sense

> to me for at least the first two options in the minimal file above to

> render correctly, since I do not understand why the ZWJ would be

> necessary other than as a kludge... but I am very ignorant, so they may

> be a good reason. Other parts of the SBL Hebrew manual talk about the

> font being able to render correctly pointing and cantilation in any

> order. However, I don't understand how and when normalisation should

> occur.

>

>

> cheers

>

> David

>

> --

> David Purton

> dcpurton at marshwiggle.net

>

> For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to

> strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him.

>                 2 Chronicles 16:9a

>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

>

> iD8DBQFMFOJ1FtfqMu4ICewRAmr4AKCUwPbSbJGCQ6bfwTYuMizr/4+1fwCfd2Nq

> 1k7Hnk0FlLXnwrU0vqt16sw=

> =2QFF

> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------

> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:

> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

>

>





-- 

--------------------------------------------------------

Avi Wollman ??? ?????

http://www.google.com/profiles/avi.wollman

--------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: 

-------------- next part --------------

A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Name: test.pdf

Type: application/pdf

Size: 11968 bytes

Desc: not available

URL: 



------------------------------



_______________________________________________

XeTeX mailing list

XeTeX at tug.org

http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex





End of XeTeX Digest, Vol 75, Issue 34

*************************************



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20100614/ba4d798d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the XeTeX mailing list