[XeTeX] fancyhdr and plyglossia
Ross Moore
ross at ics.mq.edu.au
Sun Jan 31 00:42:48 CET 2010
Hi Jens, and Vafa,
On 31/01/2010, at 9:45 AM, Ross Moore wrote:
>
> Page 6 worked for me; see attached image.
Aaagh; that was using bidi 1.0.3
> bidi.sty 2009/08/09 v1.0.3 <revision 82> Bidirectional
> typesetting in Xe
> LaTeX
It had the headers wrong, as you reported earlier.
After updating to version 1.0.4 the headers are now correct,
but those page 6 margin-pars are now gone.
> amsmath.sty 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features
> amstext.sty 2000/06/29 v2.01
> amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
> amsbsy.sty 1999/11/29 v1.2d
> amsopn.sty 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
> footnote-bidi.def
> graphicx-bidi.def
> fancyhdr-bidi.def
> article-bidi.def
> hijrical.sty 2007/12/27 v0.1 Islamic calendar
> cal-util.def
> t3cmr.fd 2001/12/31 TIPA font definitions
> ot1lmr.fd 2007/01/14 v1.3 Font defs for Latin Modern
> ***********
Sorry for that bit of noise.
However, looking at the PDF with Acrobat Pro, the missing
margin-par content is actually included in the PDF.
It is off to the right, beyond the edge of the visible
page area.
Probably it is something to do with the width assigned to
margin-pars, and is being right- rather than left-aligned.
Just speculating.
>> With best wishes and best regards,
>> Jens Bakker
>>
>>
>>
>> <alazhariya.tex>
Hope this helps,
Ross
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Moore ross at maths.mq.edu.au
Mathematics Department office: E7A-419
Macquarie University tel: +61 (0)2 9850 8955
Sydney, Australia 2109 fax: +61 (0)2 9850 8114
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list