[XeTeX] Useful link, and issue of FAQ/Wiki
Jonathan Kew
jonathan_kew at sil.org
Fri Mar 14 18:03:08 CET 2008
On 14 Mar 2008, at 4:44 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, François Charette wrote:
>>
>> I hope someone here can take the initiative of setting up a XeTeX
>> wiki
>> to which we could all contribute. Also, it would be great if someone
>> could update the information on XeTeX provided here:
>> http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=xetex (send your
>> suggestion to faq-devel at tex.ac.uk)
>
> Unless people have some "religious" views prohibiting them from using
> it - ConTeXt community already has a wiki which enables the use of
> embded
>
> <context>
> \TeX\ commands $E=mc^2$
> </context>
>
> that display as pictures. Random example:
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Table
> As well as <texcode> syntax highlighting.
Cool! I don't have any "religious" objections, and would be happy to
see more XeTeX-related material there. However, I suspect that a
dedicated XeTeX site might be easier for people to find.
> It should not be too hard to enable <xelatex> in addition to <context>
> tags (although we have been discussing <xetex> tags for ages, but the
> ratio requests/work has been too low) and I can istall additional
> fonts if needed.
>
> The problem with wikis such as one for XeTeX is always: you can write
> maybe 100 pages, and then you run out of ideas what else to write. The
> wiki of ConTeXt is way too empty.
>
> Patrick should agree on the first place if we were to set up a new
> wiki on its own or to enable XeTeX/LaTeX code in markup, but you can
> basically start putting code on ConTeXt wiki right away if you want.
Perhaps this would be a good time to mention
http://xetex.wiki.sourceforge.net/
as well as
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=194926
A while back, a colleague (Jelle) began to set up Sourceforge-hosted
services for XeTeX; in particular, a bug/feature-request tracker, and
a wiki space for documentation/faq/samples. The hope was to launch
these in conjunction with the next XeTeX release, but as that seems
to be in a perpetual not-quite-released state, maybe we should just
let you all dive in and contribute anything you like anyway.
In particular, whether or not you choose to use the SF.net-hosted
wiki space, it'd be great to start using the tracker there to report
bugs and request features, rather than just relying on emails here on
the list.
Thanks,
Jonathan
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list