[XeTeX] [OT?] "Optimized" PDFs?

[Michael B. Trausch]

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:49 +1030, Will Robertson wrote:
> I think the previous answers here have been enough to explain the
> basics, which is as much as I know. To sum it up, "linearised" or
> "optimal" PDF is larger in file size but quicker to access when the
> document is being viewed in a browser. Personally, I wouldn't bother
> doing it unless you know that the main way that people will be reading
> it is in this manner.

That seems to be the jist of it, and that is really all that I needed to
know.  I learned everything I needed to know, in fact, from this
discussion---which I am grateful for.  Thanks for the help on this one,
everyone.

	--- Mike

-- 
Michael B. Trausch                                   mike at trausch.us
home: 404-592-5746, 1                                 www.trausch.us
cell: 678-522-7934                       im: mike at trausch.us, jabber
Ubuntu Unofficial Backports Project:    http://backports.trausch.us/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20080117/738966c7/attachment.bin