[XeTeX] : Re: wrong uccode of ß

[Adam Twardoch]

Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Such a design is useless. ß is not a form of ss, but something like  
> sz. 
Well, no. At least not in Roman type ("Antiqua-Schrift").

I suggest
http://typefoundry.blogspot.com/2008/01/esszett-or.html
http://www.typeculture.com/academic_resource/articles_essays/pdfs/tc_article_45.pdf
to broaden your perspective.

A.


-- 

Adam Twardoch
| Language Typography Unicode Fonts OpenType
| twardoch.com | silesian.com | fontlab.net
| Marchlewskistr. 24 | D-10243 Berlin | Germany |
| mobile +4917620114051 | Berlin +493021237390 |