[XeTeX] x:rotate conundrum

[Jonathan Kew]

On 4 Jun 2007, at 12:52 pm, Stephen Moye wrote:

> I thought I understood how x:rotate works, but I apparently don't,  
> not completely. The following code snippet demonstrates the  
> problem. The stuff that follows the rotated bit seems to disappear  
> -- I know it doesn't really, but I can't find it, which amounts to  
> the same thing... :>} What am I missing? I'm using 0.997-dev.

Looks to me like it's all there - note that you're getting two pages  
here, not everything on one page.

JK