[XeTeX] "xeuler" package redundant?
Bruno Voisin
bvoisin at mac.com
Mon Mar 7 13:52:40 CET 2005
Le 7 mars 05, à 13:43, Will Robertson a écrit :
> If anyone who *doesn't* have the package installed (that is, never
> used Euler so didn't ever want to fix the problem) could possibly
> typeset the appended-at-end example (with XeLaTeX, of course!) and
> report whether it looks okay, I'd be most obliged.
Looks okay to me (I'm one of those persons who never used Euler),
except bold isn't bold, but I'm not sure the corresponding bold fonts
do exist. I'm mailing the PDF output off-list separately to Will.
Bruno
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list