[XeTeX] "xeuler" package redundant?

[Bruno Voisin]

Le 7 mars 05, à 13:43, Will Robertson a écrit :

> If anyone who *doesn't* have the package installed (that is, never 
> used Euler so didn't ever want to fix the problem) could possibly 
> typeset the appended-at-end example (with XeLaTeX, of course!) and 
> report whether it looks okay, I'd be most obliged.

Looks okay to me (I'm one of those persons who never used Euler), 
except bold isn't bold, but I'm not sure the corresponding bold fonts 
do exist. I'm mailing the PDF output off-list separately to Will.

Bruno