[XeTeX] Re: New feature request for XeTeX
William F. Adams
wadams at atlis.com
Mon Jul 26 15:22:39 CEST 2004
On Monday, July 26, 2004, at 07:43 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> So this font-mapping mechanism could give you easier access to simple
> characters in Unicode fonts (while keeping source text in legacy
> "hacked ASCII" encodings), but I'm doubtful that it would enable you
> to replace cmex with a Unicode version. For that, I think we really
> need a Unicode-based extension of the TFM file--which Omega has done,
> hasn't it? But XeTeX doesn't currently read OFMs.
> Given the limitations, would this still be a worthwhile extension?
Omega Translation Processes or some sort of pre-processor would seem a
lot more direct/feasible.
Alternately, is it that difficult to add a ``xetex'' (or unicode)
option to these packages?
William Adams, publishing specialist
voice - 717-731-6707 | Fax - 717-731-6708
More information about the XeTeX